|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broomhill FORUM - a meeting point for all local Community Groups from The
Banger A VISION FOR
BROOMHILL The Broomhill
Forum hosted a lively consultation meeting on 30th
January. Encouraged by coverage in the previous
Friday's Sheffield Telegraph and by local
publicity, flyers, etc, over 150 people took part.
Poster displays from community groups and other
organisations with a stake in Broomhill lined the
walls, and representatives from these bodies also
took part in the evening. As they arrived,
everyone was given a questionnaire to fill in, to
say what they liked and disliked about Broomhill,
and to express their hopes and fears for the
area. Participants
were divided into six groups. First, the groups
shared their likes and dislikes about Broomhill.
Then they were asked to come up with suggestions
making for a better Broomhill in the future. They
were also asked to say what we needed to build a
clearer understanding about. The results of each
group's work were fed back to everyone at the end
of the meeting. As they left the meeting, over 100
people handed in their completed
questionnaires. Analysis of the
questionnaires has revealed that what people liked
most about Broomhill were its shops and amenities,
its diverse community, its ready access to both
city and countryside, its architectural and
Victorian character, its friendliness and village
feel, and its green-ness. By some margin, traffic
and parking headed the list of dislikes. Next came
litter, fly-posting and graffiti, overdevelopment
and loss of family houses to multiple occupation,
and fast-food takeaways. The hopes
expressed in the questionnaires were for Broomhill
to retain its best features and lose some of its
worst: to remain a mixed, diverse, vibrant
community retaining its historic character and
amenities; for traffic to be reduced and parking
controls introduced and effectively enforced; for
there to be no further increase in multiple
occupancy. Not surprisingly, the fears expressed
were the mirror image of the hopes: unchecked
growth in multiple occupancy and property
development, and in traffic and deterioration of
shopping amenity. There seemed to be mixed
feelings about students: whilst contributing to the
vitality of the area, many feared further growth in
their numbers. The feedback
from the groups had told much the same story.
People wanted houses remaining in single
occupation, a balanced, diverse and tolerant
community, a less congested and more
pedestrian-friendly environment, cleaner streets,
conservation of the Victorian heritage and green
spaces, and better quality and diversity of shops.
They felt we needed to build a clearer
understanding about "each other" such as between
students and other residents, about being better
neighbours, about transport issues and the impact
of our own travel decisions, about the Council's
plans for the area as well as the University's
plans for its student housing, and about how best
to safeguard the delicate balance between the
diverse interest groups with a stake in
Broomhill. The Sheffield
Telegraph followed up the next week with a useful
summary of the findings of the consultation. For
BANG, this very successful event sends clear
messages to the Council as it updates its Unitary
Development Plan &endash; stronger protection is
needed of the residential, environmental and
shopping amenities of the Broomhill Conservation
Area we have fought to defend against the tide of
multiple occupancy and excessive traffic. The
event also shows BANG the value of the Forum as an
umbrella organisation in which the views of
residents can be shared with those representing
local institutions and businesses, and then
channelled to the Council and news
media. The Forum is
now drawing up a succinct vision statement
reflecting the outputs from the event. This will
form the basis of a further public consultation, at
6.30 pm on 7 May (at the Broomhill Methodist
Church), to develop specific objectives for the
Broomhill community. December
2002 YOUR VISION
FOR BROOMHILL Thursday 30
January 2003, 6.30 to 8.00 pm, Methodist Church.
Your chance to have your say about the future of
Broomhill, hear what others want for Broomhill,
guide the Broomhill Forum to benefit the Broomhill
community as a whole, and tell the Council what its
new Unitary Development Plan should do for
Broomhill. The Broomhill community is a vibrant and
diverse mix of permanent and student residents, and
educational, health and business organisations. All
are represented at the Broomhill Forum. Through
this event, the Forum aims to start building a
consensus on what we all want for Broomhill over
thecoming years. Key
stakeholders have been invited to prepare displays
showing what they want to achieve in and for
Broomhill over the next 10 to 20 years. To set the
scene, there will be a .Display of the History of
Broomhill. These displays will be on show from 3.30
pm until 8.30 pm on the day. Everyone with a stake
in Broomhill, whether as permanent resident,
university or school student, or someone working in
Broomhill in education, health, business or
commerce, is invited to come and see the displays,
see an electronic presentation from the Broomhill
Forum and share in a Consultation Workshop event
from 6.30 to 8.00 pm. Light
refreshments will be served from 5.30
pm. 12 June
2002 Broomhill Forum
workshop, Vision for Broomhill, daytime, details to
follow December
2001 Broomhill Forum
- meeitngs on 26 September & 12 December: In
September, the University of Sheffield Director of
Estates presented the University's proposed changes
to the management of its residential properties.
Forum chair echoed several concerns expressed, in
stressing the importance of building community
needs and views into the contract with the private
company that will be running the accommodation.
Council officers presented the forthcoming survey
on parking and traffic; discussion revealed strong
support for a pedestrian crossing at Newbould
Lane-Glossop Road junction for the sake of school
children's safety. Crime reports highlighted
reduced police staffing levels and increased car
crime and muggings, many involving young people. In
December, Cllr Paul Scriven reported that
prosecution of venues benefiting from fly posting
was now imminent. By December, 6 of the 8 newly
sponsored litterbins had appeared on the streets.
Richard Allan MP had secured an undertaking from
the Government that legislation would outlaw the
future removal of pub licences such as had recently
caused such outrage amongst Broomhill residents.
The Forum also heard that health hazards related to
telecoms masts were not admissible as grounds for
refusal of planning permission. Following adoption
of a new constitution to assure a representative
executive, the Forum discussed the need to involve
local retailers more fully. Jo Rowntree reported
that the Botanical Gardens restoration was going
well, the Pavilions to be opened in September
2002. VISION FOR
BROOMHILL: The December Forum agreed to set up a
working group to develop a strategic vision for the
future of Broomhill. The forthcoming review of the
Unitary Development Plan (UDP) is a once-a-decade
opportunity for the community to influence the
strategic framework used by the Council in planning
matters, such as decisions on planning
applications. For example, the current UDP classes
Broomhill as a housing area, in which non-housing
uses are approved only if they pass stringent
tests. Policies relating to other areas such as
health, housing, education and transport could also
be informed by "bottom-up" strategic thinking at
neighbourhood level. An inner suburb has particular
strengths and difficulties. How might these be
optimised over the coming decade or decades? What
do we want Broomhill to become over the next 10, 20
or even 30 years? How do we see it relating to
neighbouring areas and to the city as a whole? What
mix of populations, activities, and
inter-relationships amongst these do we want to
see? Whilst we cannot predict or control our
future, that is no reason not to try to influence
it. BANG will be represented on the Forum's
visioning group.Any
comments click here August
2000 Broomhill
Forum June
2000 Broomhill
Forum, 17 May 2000 Aug.
1999 Broomhill Forum
- a Way Forward June
1999 Broomhill
Forum, 19 May 1999 March
1999 Broomhill
Forum, 20 January 1999 Dec.
1998 Broomhill
Forum June
1998 Announcement The next
meeting of the Broomhill Forum will be held at 4.00
p.m., on Wednesday, 15 July 1998 in St. Mark's
Church Lounge. The impact of the Stonegrove
Maternity Hospital and the developments at the
Children's Hospital will be discussed, as will the
impact of the closure of the hospital car parks on
the local area. Any Broomhill resident can attend
the meeting and raise issues of concern to them.
The meetings are chaired by one of the Broomhill
councillors. Feb.
1997 Broomhill
Forum The January
meeting was sparsely attended, with no
representative from Sheffield University. The
transport policy document of Sheffield University,
which members of the Forum were given at the
January meeting was briefly discussed and the point
was made that there really should be some
consultation between both Universities on evolving
a joint policy as far as running transport
facilities for students and staff is
concerned. Nov.
1995 Broomhill
Forum |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© Map21ltd,2000 - Produced for the Broomhill Neighbourhood and Action Group by Map21Ltd |
Disclaimers - please read before using this website |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||